I’ve spent a long time arguing that I’m not an aid worker. I do my job in an office; I’m not on any kind of front line. I am not an emergency responder, and I don’t put my life at risk for my job. I’ve always said that I work in international development. I have never thought of myself as someone who “works in aid.” I work in global health, on health systems strengthening. When I’m not doing donor reporting, I don’t think all that much about the source of the funds for my work.
But the fact is, it’s kind of presumptuous to say that I work in international development. As Lee Crawfurd pointed out in response to my last blog post, aid and projects implemented with aid funding are one part of international development. Economic and trade policy are other, more important parts. You can, and do, get development without aid. I’m pretty sure you don’t get it without economic growth.
Lee elaborated on his point in an email to me:
“Policy reforms by the US and UK governments on non-aid issues could have substantially bigger impacts upon the lives of the global poor than all of the aid in the world. We should not be content with just doing aid well, and we should not be giving the impression to the public that they can just donate something and then forget about it.”
So, since I work on aid-funded projects, in my own little corner of trying to promote international development, there’s no real way around it: I am, in fact, an aid worker. When you work exclusively in aid, it’s easy to forget what a small part of the whole you are. (I decided not to edit the last post to fix my language, because if I am going to make sloppy mistakes in public, the least I can do is leave them out there so other people can avoid repeating them.)
Another useful thing that came up in my last post: Matthew Greenall reminded us that there are actually two metastories about aid, not just one. I was writing about the positive metastory. There is also the negative frame: aid doesn’t work, aid can never work, either because everything is too screwed up for any intervention of any kind to make a difference or because all the actors providing aid are stupid and incompetent. We’ve seen that metastory a lot about Haiti.
——-
What’s your take on the negative metastory? I have a hard time counteracting it in conversations with people, but I want to believe we can’t just walk away, that there must be some way aid can be helpful if conducted appropriately. Next blog post? What’s an effective model that has really made a difference? Or a plausible one yet to be tried?
I too am interested in your take on katharine’s question. When I say to people I’d like to work in the areas of aid and development, many people tell me I’m crazy, or that it’s a hopeless, thankless, endless task and I shouldn’t bother…
[…] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Michael Keizer and others. Michael Keizer said: RT @alanna_shaikh: So, I'm an aid worker – new blood and milk post – http://bloodandmilk.org/?p=1735 […]
For what it’s worth, I think health system strengthening is probably one of the best possible uses of aid. More to come when I get at a proper keyboard…
How would you define economic growth? Do you mean economic growth in the financial sense, or through “distribution of services”?
Hi Alanna,
We’ve got a book coming out in March on this very topic, “Inside the Everyday Lives of Development Workers”:
http://www.kpbooks.com/Books/BookDetail.aspx?productID=218991
If you’d like a review copy, let me know.
Erica
Kumarian Press
It’s not presumptuous to say that you work in international development even though you confine your labors to one small corner of development—just as two redoubtable quarterbacks whom you’ll remember well, Troy Aikman of Dallas and Jim Kelly of Buffalo, were not guilty of presumption in saying they played football although they neither blocked, tackled, nor kicked!
And saying you work in international development leaves plenty of room for economic and trade policy to claim a bigger portion of development than what you do.
Thank you for writing so expertly and for provoking such lively discussion.
[…] for me that makes you an aid worker. Alanna Shaikh put this very well in her recent blog “So I’m an Aid worker“. Yes you are and so am […]
I just finished listening to (I find it hard to read books these days– thank God for long car trips) James Bradley’s “The Imperial Cruise: A Secret History of Empire and War” about Teddy Roosevelt, his racism, and his support for “helping” the Filipino people. I recommend it highly.
http://www.amazon.com/Imperial-Cruise-Secret-History-Empire/dp/0316008958
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/19/books/19book.html
What of this unsettling meta-story? Yet another one to ponder.
I agree with Don (and even though I know nothing of football, I like his analogy). I’ve spent as much time working on global trade and climate change policy as I have on what would traditionally be considered ‘development’ work and both are part of the ‘international development’ picture. Do I think trade and climate change policy are likely to have the more significant impact on global poverty and health? Yes. But not without effective international health programmes in place. We are all part of the game plan, right Don? There is a game plan, right Don?
[…] I wrote about that here: http://bloodandmilk.org/2010/12/30/so-im-an-aid-worker/. […]